Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 129 cc to 1 mpg | 126 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
EJ20 2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 155 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 129 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 126 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | EJ20 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 155 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 122 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 122 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 134 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 134 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 112 cc to 1 mpg | 122 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 112 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 122 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 112 cc to 1 mpg | 122 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 112 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 122 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |