Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 e-Boxer |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 e-Boxer |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0DL |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0DL |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |