Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 DUALJET |
1.24 L (1242 cc) |
47.1% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | - |
1.0 BOOSTERJET |
1 L (998 cc) |
57.5% smaller | 21 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 DUALJET |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.24 L (1242 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 BOOSTERJET |
Precise engine size | 1 L (998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 21 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
1.3 i 16V |
1.3 L (1298 cc) |
44.7% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 GT |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 204 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TD |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 39 hp from 1 L | 191 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.3 L (1298 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 GT |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 204 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 39 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 191 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 62 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
1.3 i 16V |
1.3 L (1298 cc) |
44.7% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 130 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V 4WD |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TD |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 39 hp from 1 L | 191 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.3 L (1298 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 130 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V 4WD |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 39 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 191 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
1.3 i 16V |
1.3 L (1298 cc) |
44.7% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 GT |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TD |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 39 hp from 1 L | 191 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.3 L (1298 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 GT |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 39 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 191 cc to 100 kg |