Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.58 L (1581 cc) |
32.6% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 158 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.58 L (1581 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 158 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SX |
1.58 L (1581 cc) |
32.6% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 158 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 SX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.58 L (1581 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 158 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |