Toyota Altezza Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Toyota Altezza 2001

- Average size for generation: 2.49 L (2493 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1988 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2997 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.15 L bigger (+147 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 499 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 5.9 L smaller (-5889 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 2.07 L bigger (+2069 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 99 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0i 24V —1988 cc (1988 L)

3.0 i 24V —2997 cc (2997 L)

2.0i 24V —12.4 cc/hp (16.8 cc/kW)

3.0 i 24V —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)

2.0i 24V —15.26 or 358 cc smaller

3.0 i 24V —27.75 or 651 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0i 24V	1.99 L (1988 cc)	15.3% smaller	-	80 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
3.0 i 24V	3 L (2997 cc)	27.7% bigger	-	73 hp from 1 L	200 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0i 24V
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1988 cc)
Difference from world average	15.3 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	80 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	3.0 i 24V
Precise engine size	3 L (2997 cc)
Difference from world average	27.7 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	73 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	200 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 2.33 L (2328 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1988 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2997 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.02 L smaller (-18 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 466 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6054 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.9 L bigger (+1904 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 102 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0i 24V —1988 cc (1988 L)

2.0 i 16V RS200 —1998 cc (1998 L)

3.0 i 24V —2997 cc (2997 L)

2.0i 24V —12.4 cc/hp (16.8 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V RS200 —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)

3.0 i 24V —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)

2.0i 24V —15.26 or 358 cc smaller

2.0 i 16V RS200 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

3.0 i 24V —27.75 or 651 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0i 24V	1.99 L (1988 cc)	15.3% smaller	-	80 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V RS200	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	83 cc to 1 mpg	100 hp from 1 L	143 cc to 100 kg
3.0 i 24V	3 L (2997 cc)	27.7% bigger	-	73 hp from 1 L	200 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0i 24V
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1988 cc)
Difference from world average	15.3 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	80 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V RS200
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	83 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	100 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	143 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	3.0 i 24V
Precise engine size	3 L (2997 cc)
Difference from world average	27.7 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	73 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	200 cc to 100 kg