Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i AWD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i GT-FOUR |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 130 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i AWD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i GT-FOUR |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 130 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4WD GT-T |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 130 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD GT-T |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 130 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V CZ |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D |
1.97 L (1974 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 37 hp from 1 L | 165 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i 16V CZ |
1.84 L (1839 cc) |
21.6% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V TZ |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V CZ |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1974 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 37 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 165 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V CZ |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1839 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V TZ |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |