2018 Camry VIII (XV70)
2015 Camry VII (XV50, facelift 2014)
2012 Camry VII (XV50)
2010 Camry VI (XV40, facelift 2009)
2007 Camry VI (XV40)
2005 Camry V (XV30, facelift 2005)
2007 Camry Solara II (facelift 2006)
2007 Camry Solara II Convertible (facelift 2006)
2002 Camry V (XV30)
2004 Camry Solara II Convertible
2004 Camry Solara II
2001 Camry Solara I Convertible (Mark V, facelift 2001)
2001 Camry Solara I (Mark V, facelift 2001)
2000 Camry IV (XV20, facelift 2000)
1999 Camry Solara I (Mark V)
1999 Camry Solara I Convertible (Mark V)
1996 Camry IV (XV20)
1992 Camry III Wagon (XV10)
1991 Camry III (XV10)
1986 Camry II Wagon (V20)
1986 Camry II (V20)
1983 Camry I (V10)
1983 Camry I Hatchback (V10)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 203 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 203 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | 138 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 138 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 216 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | 150 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 150 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
3.5i V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | - | 77 hp from 1 L | 216 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 62 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
3 L (2995 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
3.3 V6 |
3.31 L (3311 cc) |
41.1% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.31 L (3311 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
3.3 V6 |
3.31 L (3311 cc) |
41.1% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.31 L (3311 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 |
3.31 L (3311 cc) |
41.1% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.31 L (3311 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
3 L (2995 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 214 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
3 L (2995 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
3.3 V6 |
3.31 L (3311 cc) |
41.1% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.31 L (3311 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 |
3.31 L (3311 cc) |
41.1% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 207 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.31 L (3311 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 207 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
3.3 V6 |
3.31 L (3311 cc) |
41.1% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 221 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.31 L (3311 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 221 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 24V |
2.99 L (2994 cc) |
27.6% bigger | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.99 L (2994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i V6 24V |
2.99 L (2994 cc) |
27.6% bigger | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.99 L (2994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
3 L (2995 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 |
2.16 L (2164 cc) |
7.8% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3 L (2995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2164 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 24V |
2.99 L (2994 cc) |
27.6% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 16V |
2.16 L (2164 cc) |
7.8% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.99 L (2994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2164 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 24V |
2.99 L (2994 cc) |
27.6% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 187 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 16V |
2.16 L (2164 cc) |
7.8% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.99 L (2994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2164 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 2.2 |
2.16 L (2164 cc) |
7.8% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
3 L (2995 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Sport 2.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2164 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 |
2.17 L (2166 cc) |
7.7% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
2.96 L (2959 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 129 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 185 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.17 L (2166 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2959 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 129 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 185 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
2.96 L (2959 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 129 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 197 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 |
2.16 L (2164 cc) |
7.8% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2959 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 129 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 197 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2164 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GLi 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo-D |
1.97 L (1974 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 43 hp from 1 L | 165 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GLi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 24V |
2.51 L (2507 cc) |
6.9% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 179 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLi 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo-D |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1974 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 43 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 165 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.51 L (2507 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 179 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.83 L (1832 cc) |
21.9% smaller | 63 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GLi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GLi 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo-D |
1.97 L (1973 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 43 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 GXi |
2.51 L (2507 cc) |
6.9% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 209 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.83 L (1832 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 63 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLi 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo-D |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1973 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 43 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 GXi |
Precise engine size | 2.51 L (2507 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 209 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 54 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 Turbo-D |
1.84 L (1839 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 40 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.83 L (1832 cc) |
21.9% smaller | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 183 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 LE |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 46 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo-D |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1839 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 40 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.83 L (1832 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 183 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 LE |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 45 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GLi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 54 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 Turbo-D |
1.84 L (1839 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 40 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo-D |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1839 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 40 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |