Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 DT |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | - | 42 hp from 1 L | 199 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 DT |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 45 hp from 1 L | 180 cc to 100 kg |
1.5i |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 DT |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 199 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 DT |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 180 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V GLi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V XLi |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 42 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V GLi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V XLi |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V GLi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V XLi |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V GTi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 88 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 42 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V GLi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V XLi |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V GTi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
1.5i 16V SG |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 32 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V GLi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V XLi |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D 4WD SE |
1.97 L (1974 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 37 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5i 16V SG |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 32 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V GLi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V XLi |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D 4WD SE |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1974 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 37 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |