cat_logo
HomeToyota

Celica

Toyota Celica Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Toyota Celica

Toyota Celica 2000

2000 Celica (T23)

Quick notes on Toyota Celica engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.8 L (1795 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1794 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.55 L smaller (-551 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 10 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 449 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6587 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1371 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 98 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

2000 Toyota Celica

  • 1.8 VT-i 16V —1794 cc (1794 L)
  • 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.8 i GT- R —1796 cc (1796 L)

    2000 Toyota Celica Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 VT-i 16V —12.5 cc/hp (17.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport —9.4 cc/hp (12.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i GT- R —9.9 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)

    2000 Toyota Celica Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 VT-i 16V —23.53 or 552 cc smaller
  • 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i GT- R —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 VT-i 16V 1.79 L
    (1794 cc)     		23.5% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 80 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 107 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i GT- R 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller - 101 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 VT-i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.79 L (1794 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 80 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 107 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i GT- R
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 101 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg

    Toyota Celica 1994

    1994 Celica Cabrio (T20)

    Quick notes on Toyota Celica engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.17 L (2166 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2166 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2166 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.18 L smaller (-180 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 1083 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6216 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.74 L bigger (+1742 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 90 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1994 Toyota Celica

  • 2.2i GT —2166 cc (2166 L)

    1994 Toyota Celica Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.2i GT —15.9 cc/hp (21.7 cc/kW)

    1994 Toyota Celica Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.2i GT —7.67 or 180 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.2i GT 2.17 L
    (2166 cc)     		7.7% smaller 87 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 181 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2i GT
    Precise engine size 2.17 L (2166 cc)
    Difference from world average 7.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 87 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 181 cc to 100 kg

    Toyota Celica 1993

    1994 Celica (T20)

    Quick notes on Toyota Celica engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.92 L (1919 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1762 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.43 L smaller (-427 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 480 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6463 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.5 L bigger (+1495 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 111 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1993 Toyota Celica

  • 1.8 i 16V —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo 4WD —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1993 Toyota Celica Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 i 16V —15.2 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo 4WD —8.3 cc/hp (11.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —11.4 cc/hp (15.5 cc/kW)

    1993 Toyota Celica Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 i 16V —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo 4WD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 i 16V 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)     		24.9% smaller 55 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 4WD 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 121 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 88 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 55 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo 4WD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 121 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 88 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg

    Toyota Celica 1989

    1990 Celica (T18)

    Quick notes on Toyota Celica engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.87 L (1869 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1587 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.48 L smaller (-477 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 374 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6513 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.45 L bigger (+1445 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 101 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1989 Toyota Celica

  • 1.8i 16V —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.6 STi —1587 cc (1587 L)
  • 2.0i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1989 Toyota Celica Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8i 16V —15.3 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 STi —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V —14.3 cc/hp (19.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —12.8 cc/hp (17.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD —9.6 cc/hp (13.1 cc/kW)

    1989 Toyota Celica Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8i 16V —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.6 STi —32.35 or 759 cc smaller
  • 2.0i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8i 16V 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)     		24.9% smaller - 65 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 STi 1.59 L
    (1587 cc)     		32.4% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 70 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 78 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 104 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 65 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 STi
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1587 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 78 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 104 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg