Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 199 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V 4WS XS |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V Twin-Cam ZS |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 90 hp from 1 L | 222 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 199 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V 4WS XS |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Twin-Cam ZS |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 90 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 222 cc to 100 kg |