Toyota MR 2 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Toyota MR 2 1999

- Average size for generation: 1.79 L (1794 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1794 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1794 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.55 L smaller (-552 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 897 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6588 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1370 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 96 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 4 / 10

1.8 16V VT-i —1794 cc (1794 L)

1.8 16V VT-i —12.8 cc/hp (17.4 cc/kW)

1.8 16V VT-i —23.53 or 552 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8 16V VT-i	1.79 L (1794 cc)	23.5% smaller	-	78 hp from 1 L	163 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8 16V VT-i
Precise engine size	1.79 L (1794 cc)
Difference from world average	23.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	78 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	163 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 2.07 L (2065 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2166 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.28 L smaller (-281 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 1033 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6317 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.64 L bigger (+1641 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 111 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.2i 16V —2166 cc (2166 L)

2.0 i 16 V —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.0i turbo GT —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.2 i 16V —2164 cc (2164 L)

2.0 16V —12.8 cc/hp (17.4 cc/kW)

2.2i 16V —15.9 cc/hp (21.7 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16 V —8.9 cc/hp (12.1 cc/kW)

2.0i turbo GT —9.6 cc/hp (13.1 cc/kW)

2.2 i 16V —16.4 cc/hp (22.3 cc/kW)

2.0 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.2i 16V —7.67 or 180 cc smaller

2.0 i 16 V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.0i turbo GT —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.2 i 16V —7.76 or 182 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 16V	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	67 cc to 1 mpg	78 hp from 1 L	-
2.2i 16V	2.17 L (2166 cc)	7.7% smaller	87 cc to 1 mpg	63 hp from 1 L	181 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16 V	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	-	113 hp from 1 L	-
2.0i turbo GT	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	62 cc to 1 mpg	104 hp from 1 L	154 cc to 100 kg
2.2 i 16V	2.16 L (2164 cc)	7.8% smaller	-	61 hp from 1 L	-

Vehicle	2.0 16V
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	67 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	78 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-
Vehicle	2.2i 16V
Precise engine size	2.17 L (2166 cc)
Difference from world average	7.7 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	87 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	63 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	181 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16 V
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	113 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-
Vehicle	2.0i turbo GT
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	62 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	104 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	154 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.2 i 16V
Precise engine size	2.16 L (2164 cc)
Difference from world average	7.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	61 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-