Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V D-4 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V D-4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |