| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5d |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | - |
| 2.0d |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 1.5d |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0d |
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5d |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | - |
| 2.0d |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 1.5d |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0d |
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0d |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | - |
| 1.5d |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0d |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 1.5d |
| Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 D4-D |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D4-D |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 D4-D |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 87 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.0 D4-D |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 D4-D |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 87 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D4-D |
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
