2019 RAV4 V
2016 RAV4 IV (facelift 2015)
2013 RAV4 IV
2012 RAV4 III (XA30, facelift 2011)
2009 RAV4 III (XA30, facelift 2008)
2009 RAV4 III (XA30, facelift 2008) Long
2006 RAV4 III (XA30)
2006 RAV4 III (XA30) Long
2004 RAV4 II (XA20, facelift 2003) 3-door
2004 RAV4 II (XA20, facelift 2003) 5-door
2001 RAV4 II (XA20) 5-door
2001 RAV4 II (XA20) 3-door
1997 RAV4 I (XA10, facelift 1997) 3-door
1997 RAV4 I (XA10, facelift 1997) 5-door
1998 RAV4 I Soft top (XA10)
1996 RAV4 I (XA10) 5-door
1995 RAV4 I (XA10) 3-door
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.49 L (2487 cc) |
6% bigger | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 88 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
TRD Off-Road 2.5 |
2.49 L (2487 cc) |
6% bigger | 92 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2487 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | TRD Off-Road 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2487 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 92 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Valvematic |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 40 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 40 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 Velvematic |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | - |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | - |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Velvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 VVT-i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 VVT-i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 VVT-i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 VVT-i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | - | 78 hp from 1 L | 216 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 VVT-i |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 216 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 VVT-i |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 VVT-i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-AD |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 VVT-i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-AD |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 VVT-i |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 148 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | - | 78 hp from 1 L | 203 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 VVT-i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 203 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 VVTi |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 VVTi |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.4i |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 VVTi |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 16V D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 VVTi |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |