2016 Tacoma III Double Cab
2016 Tacoma III Double Cab Long
2016 Tacoma III Access Cab
2012 Tacoma II Double Cab (facelift 2012)
2012 Tacoma II Single Cab (facelift 2012)
2012 Tacoma II Access Cab (facelift 2012)
2005 Tacoma II Single Cab
2005 Tacoma II Double Cab
2005 Tacoma II Access Cab
2001 Tacoma I Double Cab (facelift 2000)
2001 Tacoma I xTracab (facelift 2000)
2001 Tacoma I Single Cab (facelift 2000)
1995 Tacoma I xTracab
1995 Tacoma I Single Cab
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | 173 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 173 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 173 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 173 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | 173 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | - |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 173 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.46 L (3456 cc) |
47.3% bigger | 182 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 173 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | 135 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.46 L (3456 cc) |
Difference from world average | 47.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 182 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 173 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 135 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
4.0 V6 |
3.96 L (3956 cc) |
68.6% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.96 L (3956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 68.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
4.0 V6 |
3.96 L (3955 cc) |
68.6% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.96 L (3955 cc) |
Difference from world average | 68.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
3.96 L (3955 cc) |
68.6% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | - |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.96 L (3955 cc) |
Difference from world average | 68.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
4.0 V6 |
3.96 L (3955 cc) |
68.6% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.96 L (3955 cc) |
Difference from world average | 68.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
4.0 V6 |
3.96 L (3956 cc) |
68.6% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.96 L (3956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 68.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
3.96 L (3956 cc) |
68.6% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 220 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.96 L (3956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 68.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 220 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.4 V6 |
3.38 L (3378 cc) |
44% bigger | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 282 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.39 L (2392 cc) |
2% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 199 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.38 L (3378 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 282 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2392 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 199 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.39 L (2392 cc) |
2% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
3.4 V6 |
3.38 L (3378 cc) |
44% bigger | - | 56 hp from 1 L | - |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 225 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2392 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.38 L (3378 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 225 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.39 L (2392 cc) |
2% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 225 cc to 100 kg |
3.4 V6 |
3.38 L (3378 cc) |
44% bigger | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 211 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2392 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 225 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.38 L (3378 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 211 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.39 L (2392 cc) |
2% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
3.4 V6 |
3.38 L (3378 cc) |
44% bigger | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 225 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2392 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.38 L (3378 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 225 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.39 L (2392 cc) |
2% bigger | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
2.7 |
2.69 L (2694 cc) |
14.8% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 225 cc to 100 kg |
3.4 V6 |
3.38 L (3378 cc) |
44% bigger | - | 56 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2392 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2694 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 225 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.38 L (3378 cc) |
Difference from world average | 44 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |