Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4 WD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4 WD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD |
1.97 L (1974 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 46 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i 16V |
1.84 L (1839 cc) |
21.6% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TD |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | - | 42 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1974 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1839 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 45 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.83 L (1832 cc) |
21.9% smaller | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.83 L (1832 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |