| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0i |
1.99 L (1986 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
| 1.8i |
1.8 L (1797 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0i |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1986 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 1.8i |
| Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1797 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0i |
1.99 L (1986 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
| 1.8i |
1.8 L (1797 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0i |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1986 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 1.8i |
| Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1797 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
| 1.8 |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
