2017 Insignia II Grand Sport
2017 Insignia II Sports Tourer
2017 Insignia II Country Tourer
2013 Insignia I Sports Tourer (facelift 2013)
2013 Insignia I Saloon (facelift 2013)
2013 Insignia I Hatchback (facelift 2013)
2013 Insignia I Country Tourer
2008 Insignia I Saloon
2008 Insignia I Hatchback
2008 Insignia I Sports Tourer
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 EcoTEC Turbo D |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 Turbo D |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 EcoTEC Turbo |
1.49 L (1490 cc) |
36.5% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 94 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 Turbo |
1.49 L (1490 cc) |
36.5% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 Turbo D BlueInjection |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 130 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo D |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 BiTurbo D |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | - |
GSI 2.0 BiTurbo D |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 63 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoTEC Turbo D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 Turbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoTEC Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.49 L (1490 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 94 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.49 L (1490 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo D BlueInjection |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 130 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 BiTurbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | GSI 2.0 BiTurbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 63 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Turbo D BlueInjection |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 EcoTEC Turbo |
1.49 L (1490 cc) |
36.5% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 94 hp from 1 L | 99 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 130 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 Turbo |
1.49 L (1490 cc) |
36.5% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 99 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo D BlueInjection |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoTEC Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.49 L (1490 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 94 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 99 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 130 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.49 L (1490 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 99 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Turbo D BlueInjection |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo D BlueInjection |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i Turbo ecoTEC |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoFLEX |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoFlex |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 99 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
1.4i Turbo ecoTEC |
1.36 L (1364 cc) |
41.9% smaller | 32 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 85 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoFLEX |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoFlex |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 99 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.36 L (1364 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 32 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 85 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 99 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i Turbo ecoTEC |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i ecoTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoFLEX |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoFlex |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.4i Turbo ecoTEC |
1.36 L (1364 cc) |
41.9% smaller | 30 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 91 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 99 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoFLEX |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoFlex |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.36 L (1364 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 30 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 91 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i Turbo ecoTEC |
1.36 L (1364 cc) |
41.9% smaller | 30 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 85 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i ecoTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i Turbo ecoTEC |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 40 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoFLEX |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 99 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoFlex |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4i Turbo ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.36 L (1364 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 30 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 85 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 40 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoFLEX |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 99 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoFlex |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 109 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 99 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 109 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi BiTurbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 99 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 130 cc to 100 kg |
2.8i Turbo ecoTEC |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | 140 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 110 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i ecoTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 130 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 140 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 110 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i ecoTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.8i Turbo ecoTEC |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | 140 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 140 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 110 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i ecoTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.8i Turbo ecoTEC |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | 140 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo ecoTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8i Turbo ecoTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 140 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |