Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i V6 24V |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i V6 24V |
2.96 L (2962 cc) |
26.3% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 185 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 DTI 16V |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | - |
5.7 V8 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | - | 55 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2962 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 185 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 DTI 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i V6 |
2.96 L (2962 cc) |
26.3% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 174 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i V6 |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 DTI 16V |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
5.7 V8 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | - | 55 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2962 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 174 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 DTI 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |