Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 TD |
2.26 L (2260 cc) |
3.7% smaller | - | 38 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 E |
1.98 L (1979 cc) |
15.6% smaller | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i |
2.2 L (2197 cc) |
6.4% smaller | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.49 L (2490 cc) |
6.1% bigger | - | 46 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 E |
2.49 L (2490 cc) |
6.1% bigger | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.8 |
2.78 L (2784 cc) |
18.7% bigger | - | 50 hp from 1 L | 199 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
2.97 L (2969 cc) |
26.6% bigger | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 212 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 E V6 |
2.97 L (2969 cc) |
26.6% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2260 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 38 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1979 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2197 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2490 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 E |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2490 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8 |
Precise engine size | 2.78 L (2784 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 199 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 E V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 |
2.78 L (2784 cc) |
18.7% bigger | - | 50 hp from 1 L | 199 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
2.97 L (2969 cc) |
26.6% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 212 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 |
2.97 L (2969 cc) |
26.6% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.78 L (2784 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 199 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 212 cc to 100 kg |