Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0i ecoFLEX |
1 L (999 cc) |
57.4% smaller | 18 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | - |
1.0i |
1 L (999 cc) |
57.4% smaller | 19 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.0i ecoFLEX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1 L (999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 18 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.0i |
Precise engine size | 1 L (999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 19 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1100 SL90 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
1256 |
1.26 L (1256 cc) |
46.5% smaller | - | 46 hp from 1 L | 140 cc to 100 kg |
1600 |
1.6 L (1599 cc) |
31.8% smaller | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2300 |
2.28 L (2279 cc) |
2.9% smaller | - | 48 hp from 1 L | 253 cc to 100 kg |
1800 |
1.76 L (1759 cc) |
25% smaller | - | 44 hp from 1 L | 195 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 SL90 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1256 |
Precise engine size | 1.26 L (1256 cc) |
Difference from world average | 46.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 140 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1599 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2300 |
Precise engine size | 2.28 L (2279 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 253 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1800 |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1759 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 44 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 195 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1100 SL90 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
1256 |
1.26 L (1256 cc) |
46.5% smaller | - | 46 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
1600 |
1.6 L (1599 cc) |
31.8% smaller | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
1800 |
1.76 L (1759 cc) |
25% smaller | - | 44 hp from 1 L | 220 cc to 100 kg |
2300 |
2.28 L (2279 cc) |
2.9% smaller | - | 48 hp from 1 L | 285 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 SL90 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1256 |
Precise engine size | 1.26 L (1256 cc) |
Difference from world average | 46.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1599 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1800 |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1759 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 44 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 220 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2300 |
Precise engine size | 2.28 L (2279 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 285 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600 |
1.6 L (1599 cc) |
31.8% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
1100 |
1.06 L (1057 cc) |
54.9% smaller | - | 45 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
1.2 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
1100 SL90 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1599 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 |
Precise engine size | 1.06 L (1057 cc) |
Difference from world average | 54.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 SL90 |
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
1600 |
1.6 L (1599 cc) |
31.8% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | - |
GT 2.0 |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 219 cc to 100 kg |
1100 SL90 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
1100 |
1.16 L (1159 cc) |
50.6% smaller | - | 41 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1599 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 219 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 SL90 |
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 |
Precise engine size | 1.16 L (1159 cc) |
Difference from world average | 50.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 41 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1100 |
1.06 L (1057 cc) |
54.9% smaller | - | 42 hp from 1 L | 151 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1100 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.06 L (1057 cc) |
Difference from world average | 54.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 151 cc to 100 kg |