Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 79 cc to 1 mpg | 135 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 96 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 BiTDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 122 hp from 1 L | 109 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 TSI |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 TSI ACT |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 79 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 135 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 BiTDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 122 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 109 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI ACT |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |