Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI |
1.2 L (1197 cc) |
49% smaller | 26 cc to 1 mpg | 88 hp from 1 L | 92 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 TSI |
1.4 L (1395 cc) |
40.5% smaller | 32 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 151 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.2 L (1197 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 26 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 92 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.4 L (1395 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 32 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 151 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
1.2 TSI |
1.2 L (1197 cc) |
49% smaller | 27 cc to 1 mpg | 88 hp from 1 L | 92 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 TSI |
1.4 L (1395 cc) |
40.5% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.2 L (1197 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 27 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 92 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.4 L (1395 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TSI |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 34 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 93 cc to 100 kg |
1.2 TSI |
1.2 L (1197 cc) |
49% smaller | 28 cc to 1 mpg | 88 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 34 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 93 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.2 L (1197 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 28 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI |
1.2 L (1197 cc) |
49% smaller | 30 cc to 1 mpg | 88 hp from 1 L | 92 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 TSI |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 32 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 99 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.2 L (1197 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 30 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 92 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 32 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 99 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 Turbo |
1.78 L (1781 cc) |
24.1% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 127 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1595 cc) |
32% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 73 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TDI |
1.9 L (1896 cc) |
19.2% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 135 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.78 L (1781 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1595 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 73 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.9 L (1896 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 135 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TDI |
1.9 L (1896 cc) |
19.2% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1595 cc) |
32% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 76 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 Turbo |
1.78 L (1781 cc) |
24.1% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.9 L (1896 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1595 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 76 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.78 L (1781 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 76 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
1.4i 16V |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i |
1.6 L (1595 cc) |
32% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i Turbo |
1.78 L (1781 cc) |
24.1% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 127 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TDI |
1.9 L (1896 cc) |
19.2% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 135 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 73 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 76 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1595 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.78 L (1781 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.9 L (1896 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 135 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 73 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 TDI |
1.9 L (1896 cc) |
19.2% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 73 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 165 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1595 cc) |
32% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 i 16V |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 T |
1.78 L (1781 cc) |
24.1% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 VR5 20V |
2.32 L (2324 cc) |
0.9% smaller | 89 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 179 cc to 100 kg |
RSI 3.2 |
3.19 L (3189 cc) |
35.9% bigger | 159 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 213 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.9 L (1896 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 73 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 165 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1595 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 T |
Precise engine size | 1.78 L (1781 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 VR5 20V |
Precise engine size | 2.32 L (2324 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 89 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 179 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | RSI 3.2 |
Precise engine size | 3.19 L (3189 cc) |
Difference from world average | 35.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 159 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 213 cc to 100 kg |