Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 Total Flex |
1 L (999 cc) |
57.4% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 Total Flex |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.0 Total Flex |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1 L (999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 Total Flex |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 |
1 L (999 cc) |
57.4% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | - |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1 L (999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |