Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | - | 103 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 104 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 79 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 90 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 104 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 79 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 90 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 90 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 90 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 90 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDI |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 90 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDI |
2.46 L (2461 cc) |
4.9% bigger | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDI |
2.46 L (2461 cc) |
4.9% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |