Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 |
1.72 L (1721 cc) |
26.6% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 172 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 Turbo |
1.76 L (1761 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
Precise engine size | 1.72 L (1721 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 172 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1761 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |