Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T2 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 T2 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 36 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D3 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 39 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D2 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 39 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D4 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 96 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T3 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T4 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 96 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T5 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 124 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 T3 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 T2 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 36 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 39 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D2 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 39 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 124 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T3 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D4 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 36 cc to 1 mpg | 96 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 T3 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D2 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 39 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T4 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 96 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D3 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 39 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T5 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 124 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T3 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 36 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D2 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 39 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 39 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 124 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T4 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D4 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T5 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 124 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T2 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D2 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 27 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 T2 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T3 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 T3 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | - |
1.6 D2 |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 26 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D3 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 T3 |
1.6 L (1596 cc) |
32% smaller | 39 cc to 1 mpg | 94 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 T4 |
1.6 L (1596 cc) |
32% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 113 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 T5 |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 102 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 T2 |
1.6 L (1596 cc) |
32% smaller | 36 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 124 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T2 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D2 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 27 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 T2 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 D2 |
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 26 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1596 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 39 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 94 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1596 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 T5 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T2 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1596 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 36 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T5 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 68 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D4 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T4 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | - | 91 hp from 1 L | - |
1.5 T3 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 36 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D2 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 T3 |
1.97 L (1969 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | - |
1.6 T4 |
1.6 L (1596 cc) |
32% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 113 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 T5 |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 89 cc to 1 mpg | 102 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 D2 |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 27 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D3 |
1.98 L (1984 cc) |
15.4% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 68 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 36 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D2 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 T3 |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1969 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1596 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 T5 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 89 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 D2 |
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 27 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1984 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
1.95 L (1948 cc) |
17% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 16V |
1.73 L (1731 cc) |
26.2% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T |
1.95 L (1948 cc) |
17% smaller | - | 82 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 16V |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 GDI |
1.83 L (1834 cc) |
21.8% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 D |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T4 |
1.95 L (1948 cc) |
17% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 103 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TD |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | - | 48 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1948 cc) |
Difference from world average | 17 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.73 L (1731 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1948 cc) |
Difference from world average | 17 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.83 L (1834 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1948 cc) |
Difference from world average | 17 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 103 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |