Volvo V40 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Volvo V40

Quick notes on Volvo V40 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.86 L (1864 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1969 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.48 L smaller (-482 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 373 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6518 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.44 L bigger (+1440 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 155 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2016 Volvo V40 (facelift 2016) engine size

  • 2.0 T2 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.5 T2 —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D2 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T5 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.5 T3 —1498 cc (1498 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T2 —16.1 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 T2 —12.3 cc/hp (16.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —13.1 cc/hp (17.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 —16.4 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 —13 cc/hp (17.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 —8 cc/hp (10.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 —9.9 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T2 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.5 T2 —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D2 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.5 T3 —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T2 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 131 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 T2 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 36 cc to 1 mpg 81 hp from 1 L 100 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D2 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 77 hp from 1 L 131 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 124 hp from 1 L -
    1.5 T3 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 37 cc to 1 mpg 101 hp from 1 L 100 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T2
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 131 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 T2
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 36 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 81 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 100 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 77 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 131 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 124 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 37 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 101 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 100 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.9 L (1902 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1498 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1969 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-444 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 380 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6480 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.48 L bigger (+1478 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 161 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2016 Volvo V40 Cross Country (facelift 2016) engine size

  • 2.0 T3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.5 T3 —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 D2 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T5 —1969 cc (1969 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T3 —13 cc/hp (17.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 —9.9 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 —16.4 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —13.1 cc/hp (17.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 —8 cc/hp (10.9 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.5 T3 —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D2 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 77 hp from 1 L 131 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 36 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L 131 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 T3 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 37 cc to 1 mpg 101 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 D2 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 124 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 77 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 131 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 36 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 131 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 37 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 101 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 124 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.83 L (1834 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1498 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2497 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.51 L smaller (-512 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 367 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6548 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.41 L bigger (+1410 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 155 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2013 Volvo V40 (2012) engine size

  • 2.0 T4 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 D4 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 T5 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T2 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D2 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.5 T2 —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 T3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.5 T3 —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 1.6 D2 —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 1.6 T3 —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 1.6 T4 —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 2.5 T5 —2497 cc (2497 L)
  • 1.6 T2 —1596 cc (1596 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T4 —11 cc/hp (15 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 —11.2 cc/hp (15.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 —8 cc/hp (10.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T2 —16.1 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 —16.4 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 T2 —12.3 cc/hp (16.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 —13 cc/hp (17.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 —9.9 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 D2 —13.6 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —13.2 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 T3 —10.6 cc/hp (14.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 —8.9 cc/hp (12.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 T5 —9.8 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 T2 —13.3 cc/hp (18.1 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T4 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D4 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T2 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D2 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.5 T2 —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.5 T3 —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 1.6 D2 —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D3 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 1.6 T3 —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 1.6 T4 —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 2.5 T5 —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • 1.6 T2 —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T4 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 91 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 D4 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller 38 cc to 1 mpg 89 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 124 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T2 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 D2 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 27 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L -
    1.5 T2 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 35 cc to 1 mpg 81 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 77 hp from 1 L -
    1.5 T3 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 35 cc to 1 mpg 101 hp from 1 L -
    1.6 D2 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 26 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 T3 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)
    32% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 94 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 T4 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)
    32% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 113 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 T5 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)
    6.4% bigger 83 cc to 1 mpg 102 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 T2 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)
    32% smaller 36 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 106 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 91 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 38 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 89 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 124 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T2
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 27 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.5 T2
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 35 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 81 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 77 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 35 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 101 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 26 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 T3
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 94 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 113 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 T5
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 83 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 102 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 T2
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 36 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 106 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.9 L (1903 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1498 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2497 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-443 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 381 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6479 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.48 L bigger (+1479 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 158 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2013 Volvo V40 Cross Country engine size

  • 2.0 T5 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 D4 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 T4 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 1.5 T3 —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 D2 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.6 T4 —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 2.5 T5 —2497 cc (2497 L)
  • 1.6 D2 —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1984 cc (1984 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T5 —9.3 cc/hp (12.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 —11.2 cc/hp (15.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 —11 cc/hp (15 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 —9.9 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 —16.4 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 —13 cc/hp (17.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 —8.9 cc/hp (12.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 T5 —9.8 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 D2 —13.6 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —13.2 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T5 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D4 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T4 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 1.5 T3 —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D2 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.6 T4 —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 2.5 T5 —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • 1.6 D2 —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D3 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T5 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller 68 cc to 1 mpg 108 hp from 1 L 124 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D4 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller 44 cc to 1 mpg 89 hp from 1 L 124 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T4 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller - 91 hp from 1 L -
    1.5 T3 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 36 cc to 1 mpg 101 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 D2 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 T3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 77 hp from 1 L -
    1.6 T4 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)
    32% smaller 37 cc to 1 mpg 113 hp from 1 L 106 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 T5 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)
    6.4% bigger 89 cc to 1 mpg 102 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 D2 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 27 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)
    15.4% smaller 44 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 124 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 68 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 108 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 124 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 44 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 89 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 124 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 91 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 36 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 101 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 77 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 37 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 113 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 106 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 T5
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 102 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 27 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 44 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 124 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.84 L (1842 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1587 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1948 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.5 L smaller (-504 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 368 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6540 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.42 L bigger (+1418 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 112 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1996 Volvo V40 Combi (VW) engine size

  • 2.0 16V —1948 cc (1948 L)
  • 1.8 16V —1731 cc (1731 L)
  • 2.0 T —1948 cc (1948 L)
  • 1.6 16V —1587 cc (1587 L)
  • 1.8 GDI —1834 cc (1834 L)
  • 1.9 D —1870 cc (1870 L)
  • 2.0 T4 —1948 cc (1948 L)
  • 1.9 TD —1870 cc (1870 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 16V —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V —15.1 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T —12.2 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 16V —14.6 cc/hp (19.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 GDI —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 D —16.3 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 —9.7 cc/hp (13.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 TD —20.8 cc/hp (28.3 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 16V —16.97 or 398 cc smaller
  • 1.8 16V —26.21 or 615 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T —16.97 or 398 cc smaller
  • 1.6 16V —32.35 or 759 cc smaller
  • 1.8 GDI —21.82 or 512 cc smaller
  • 1.9 D —20.29 or 476 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T4 —16.97 or 398 cc smaller
  • 1.9 TD —20.29 or 476 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 16V 1.95 L
    (1948 cc)
    17% smaller - 70 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 16V 1.73 L
    (1731 cc)
    26.2% smaller 60 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T 1.95 L
    (1948 cc)
    17% smaller - 82 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 16V 1.59 L
    (1587 cc)
    32.4% smaller - 69 hp from 1 L 122 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 GDI 1.83 L
    (1834 cc)
    21.8% smaller - 67 hp from 1 L 141 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 D 1.87 L
    (1870 cc)
    20.3% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T4 1.95 L
    (1948 cc)
    17% smaller 70 cc to 1 mpg 103 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 TD 1.87 L
    (1870 cc)
    20.3% smaller - 48 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1948 cc)
    Difference from world average 17 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Precise engine size 1.73 L (1731 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 60 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1948 cc)
    Difference from world average 17 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1587 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 122 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 GDI
    Precise engine size 1.83 L (1834 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 141 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Precise engine size 1.87 L (1870 cc)
    Difference from world average 20.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1948 cc)
    Difference from world average 17 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 70 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 103 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Precise engine size 1.87 L (1870 cc)
    Difference from world average 20.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 48 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg