cat_logo
HomeVolvo

Xc60

Volvo XC60 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Volvo XC60

Volvo XC60 2018

2018 XC60 II

Quick notes on Volvo XC60 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1969 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1969 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.38 L smaller (-377 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 8 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 394 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6413 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.55 L bigger (+1545 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 204 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2018 Volvo XC60

  • 2.0 T8 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T5 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T6 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D5 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T8 Twin Engine —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 B4 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 B5 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • Polestar 2.0 T8 —1969 cc (1969 L)

    2018 Volvo XC60 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T8 —6.2 cc/hp (8.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 —7.9 cc/hp (10.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T6 —6.4 cc/hp (8.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D5 —8.4 cc/hp (11.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —13.1 cc/hp (17.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T8 Twin Engine —6.5 cc/hp (8.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 B4 —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 B5 —8.4 cc/hp (11.4 cc/kW)
  • Polestar 2.0 T8 —6.2 cc/hp (8.5 cc/kW)

    2018 Volvo XC60 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T8 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T6 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D3 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T8 Twin Engine —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 B4 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 B5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • Polestar 2.0 T8 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T8 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 18 cc to 1 mpg 162 hp from 1 L 94 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 60 cc to 1 mpg 127 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T6 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 157 hp from 1 L 98 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 119 hp from 1 L 94 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 42 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T8 Twin Engine 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 19 cc to 1 mpg 154 hp from 1 L 90 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 60 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 B4 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 100 hp from 1 L 98 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 B5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 119 hp from 1 L 98 cc to 100 kg
    Polestar 2.0 T8 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 17 cc to 1 mpg 161 hp from 1 L 90 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T8
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 18 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 162 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 94 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 60 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 127 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T6
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 157 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 98 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 119 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 94 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 42 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T8 Twin Engine
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 19 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 154 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 90 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 60 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 B4
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 100 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 98 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 B5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 119 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 98 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Polestar 2.0 T8
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 17 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 161 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 90 cc to 100 kg

    Volvo XC60 2013

    2014 XC60 I (2013 facelift)

    Quick notes on Volvo XC60 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.24 L (2236 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1969 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2953 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.11 L smaller (-110 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 10 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 447 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6146 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.81 L bigger (+1812 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 177 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2013 Volvo XC60

  • 2.0 T5 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.0 T6 —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 2.4 D4 —2400 cc (2400 L)
  • 2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo —2400 cc (2400 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.5 T5 —2497 cc (2497 L)
  • 2.0 D4 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 3.0 T6 —2953 cc (2953 L)

    2013 Volvo XC60 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T5 —8 cc/hp (10.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo —10.4 cc/hp (14.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T6 —6.4 cc/hp (8.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D4 —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo —11.2 cc/hp (15.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —14.6 cc/hp (19.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 T5 —9.8 cc/hp (13.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 —12.2 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 —9.7 cc/hp (13.2 cc/kW)

    2013 Volvo XC60 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T5 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.0 T6 —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 2.4 D4 —2.3 or 54 cc bigger
  • 2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo —2.3 or 54 cc bigger
  • 2.0 D3 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.5 T5 —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • 2.0 D4 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 3.0 T6 —25.87 or 607 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T5 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 124 hp from 1 L 109 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 96 hp from 1 L 109 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T6 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)     		16.1% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 155 hp from 1 L 109 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D4 2.4 L
    (2400 cc)     		2.3% bigger 55 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 126 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo 2.4 L
    (2400 cc)     		2.3% bigger 65 cc to 1 mpg 90 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 110 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 T5 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)     		6.4% bigger 96 cc to 1 mpg 102 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D4 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 82 hp from 1 L 110 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 T6 2.95 L
    (2953 cc)     		25.9% bigger 134 cc to 1 mpg 103 hp from 1 L 164 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 124 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 109 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 96 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 109 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T6
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 155 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 109 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D4
    Precise engine size 2.4 L (2400 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 55 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 126 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo
    Precise engine size 2.4 L (2400 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 65 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 90 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 110 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 T5
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 96 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 102 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 110 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Precise engine size 2.95 L (2953 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 134 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 103 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 164 cc to 100 kg

    Volvo XC60 2010

    2009 XC60 I

    Quick notes on Volvo XC60 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.41 L (2413 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1984 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3192 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.07 L bigger (+67 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 483 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6 L smaller (-5969 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.99 L bigger (+1989 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 161 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2010 Volvo XC60

  • 2.4 D5 —2400 cc (2400 L)
  • 2.4D —2401 cc (2401 L)
  • 3.0 T6 —2953 cc (2953 L)
  • 3.2 —3192 cc (3192 L)
  • 2.4D DRIVe —2400 cc (2400 L)
  • 2.0 D3 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 Drive —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.4 D3 —2400 cc (2400 L)
  • 2.0 T5 —1999 cc (1999 L)

    2010 Volvo XC60 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.4 D5 —11.2 cc/hp (15.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.4D —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 —9.7 cc/hp (13.2 cc/kW)
  • 3.2 —13.1 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.4D DRIVe —13.7 cc/hp (18.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 —12.2 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Drive —12.2 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D3 —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)

    2010 Volvo XC60 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.4 D5 —2.3 or 54 cc bigger
  • 2.4D —2.34 or 55 cc bigger
  • 3.0 T6 —25.87 or 607 cc bigger
  • 3.2 —36.06 or 846 cc bigger
  • 2.4D DRIVe —2.3 or 54 cc bigger
  • 2.0 D3 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Drive —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.4 D3 —2.3 or 54 cc bigger
  • 2.0 T5 —14.79 or 347 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.4 D5 2.4 L
    (2400 cc)     		2.3% bigger 59 cc to 1 mpg 90 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.4D 2.4 L
    (2401 cc)     		2.3% bigger 86 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 T6 2.95 L
    (2953 cc)     		25.9% bigger 134 cc to 1 mpg 103 hp from 1 L 164 cc to 100 kg
    3.2 3.19 L
    (3192 cc)     		36.1% bigger 133 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 177 cc to 100 kg
    2.4D DRIVe 2.4 L
    (2400 cc)     		2.3% bigger 62 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D3 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 82 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Drive 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 82 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D3 2.4 L
    (2400 cc)     		2.3% bigger 59 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 T5 2 L
    (1999 cc)     		14.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 120 hp from 1 L 118 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Precise engine size 2.4 L (2400 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 59 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 90 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4D
    Precise engine size 2.4 L (2401 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 86 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Precise engine size 2.95 L (2953 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 134 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 103 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 164 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.19 L (3192 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 133 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 177 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4D DRIVe
    Precise engine size 2.4 L (2400 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Drive
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D3
    Precise engine size 2.4 L (2400 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 59 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 118 cc to 100 kg