Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 81 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V Type S |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 106 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Type S |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 L |
1.83 L (1834 cc) |
21.8% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 L |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.83 L (1834 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 L |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 L |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |