Alfa Romeo 145 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Alfa Romeo 145

Quick notes on Alfa Romeo 145 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.91 L (1910 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1910 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1910 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-436 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 478 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6472 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.49 L bigger (+1486 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 134 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1999 Alfa Romeo 145 (930, facelift 1999) engine size

  • 1.9 JTD —1910 cc (1910 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 JTD —18.2 cc/hp (24.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 JTD —18.58 or 436 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 JTD 1.91 L
    (1910 cc)
    18.6% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 JTD
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1910 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Alfa Romeo 145 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.69 L (1691 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.4 L (1351 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1970 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.66 L smaller (-655 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 338 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6691 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.27 L bigger (+1267 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 92 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1994 Alfa Romeo 145 (930) engine size

  • 1.4 i.e. —1351 cc (1351 L)
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. —1370 cc (1370 L)
  • 1.6 i.e. —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V —1747 cc (1747 L)
  • 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio —1969 cc (1969 L)
  • 1.9 TD —1929 cc (1929 L)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. —1970 cc (1970 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.4 i.e. —15 cc/hp (20.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. —13.3 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V —12.1 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio —12.7 cc/hp (17.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 TD —21.4 cc/hp (29.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. —13.1 cc/hp (17.9 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.4 i.e. —42.41 or 995 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. —41.6 or 976 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i.e. —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V —25.53 or 599 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio —16.07 or 377 cc smaller
  • 1.9 TD —17.77 or 417 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V T.S. —16.03 or 376 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.4 i.e. 1.35 L
    (1351 cc)
    42.4% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller - 75 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. 1.37 L
    (1370 cc)
    41.6% smaller - 75 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i.e. 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)
    32% smaller 55 cc to 1 mpg 64 hp from 1 L 145 cc to 100 kg
    1.7 i.e. 16V 1.75 L
    (1747 cc)
    25.5% smaller - 82 hp from 1 L 146 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V Quadrifoglio 1.97 L
    (1969 cc)
    16.1% smaller 70 cc to 1 mpg 79 hp from 1 L 164 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 TD 1.93 L
    (1929 cc)
    17.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 161 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V T.S. 1.97 L
    (1970 cc)
    16% smaller 68 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 152 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.4 i.e.
    Precise engine size 1.35 L (1351 cc)
    Difference from world average 42.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Precise engine size 1.37 L (1370 cc)
    Difference from world average 41.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 55 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 145 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7 i.e. 16V
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1747 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 146 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1969 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 70 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 79 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 164 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Precise engine size 1.93 L (1929 cc)
    Difference from world average 17.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 161 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V T.S.
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1970 cc)
    Difference from world average 16 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 68 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 152 cc to 100 kg