Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i V6 4WD |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 208 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V 4WD |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 4WD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V 4WD |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i V6 4WD |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i V6 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i V6 24V |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4 WD |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 4WD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4 WD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |