Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.99 L (1986 cc) |
15.3% smaller | - | 116 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.65 L (3649 cc) |
55.5% bigger | - | 85 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 78 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1986 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 116 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.65 L (3649 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 78 hp from 1 L | - |
3.6 V6 |
3.65 L (3649 cc) |
55.5% bigger | - | 85 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.65 L (3649 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Denali 3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | - | 81 hp from 1 L | 170 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | - | 79 hp from 1 L | 170 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Denali 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 170 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 170 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | 170 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 170 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 170 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 170 cc to 100 kg |