Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 i V6 24V |
2.66 L (2657 cc) |
13.3% bigger | 116 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 204 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2657 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 116 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 204 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 16V |
1.6 L (1599 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1599 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1599 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1599 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |