Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | 82 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4X4 |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 82 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4X4 |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |