Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 JTD |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 i V6 24V |
2.96 L (2959 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 148 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 JTD |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 68 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2959 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 148 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 JTD |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 68 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |