Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i V6 Turbo |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i V6 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 12V |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 i V6 |
2.95 L (2954 cc) |
25.9% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 197 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 i V6 24V |
2.95 L (2954 cc) |
25.9% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 197 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 12V |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2954 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 197 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2954 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 197 cc to 100 kg |