Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 320 CDI |
2.99 L (2987 cc) |
27.3% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 200 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 102 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 280 |
3 L (2996 cc) |
27.7% bigger | 120 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 187 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 350 |
3 L (2996 cc) |
27.7% bigger | 130 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 500 |
5.46 L (5461 cc) |
132.8% bigger | 273 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 303 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 CDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.99 L (2987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 280 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 120 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 350 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 130 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Precise engine size | 5.46 L (5461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 132.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 273 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 303 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 350 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 146 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 233 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 200 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 102 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 280 |
3 L (2996 cc) |
27.7% bigger | 115 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
AMG CLK 63 |
6.21 L (6208 cc) |
164.6% bigger | 365 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 365 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 220 CDI |
2.15 L (2148 cc) |
8.4% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 CDI |
2.99 L (2987 cc) |
27.3% bigger | 93 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 199 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 500 |
5.46 L (5461 cc) |
132.8% bigger | 260 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 341 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 350 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 146 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 233 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 280 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 115 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | AMG CLK 63 |
Precise engine size | 6.21 L (6208 cc) |
Difference from world average | 164.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 365 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 365 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 220 CDI |
Precise engine size | 2.15 L (2148 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 CDI |
Precise engine size | 2.99 L (2987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 93 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 199 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Precise engine size | 5.46 L (5461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 132.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 260 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 341 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 CGI |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 94 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 500 |
4.97 L (4966 cc) |
111.7% bigger | 248 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 276 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 240 |
2.6 L (2597 cc) |
10.7% bigger | 118 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 |
3.2 L (3199 cc) |
36.4% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 188 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 200 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 CGI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 94 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Precise engine size | 4.97 L (4966 cc) |
Difference from world average | 111.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 248 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 276 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 240 |
Precise engine size | 2.6 L (2597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 10.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 118 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 CGI |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 94 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 270 CDI |
2.69 L (2685 cc) |
14.5% bigger | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 500 |
4.97 L (4966 cc) |
111.7% bigger | 248 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 292 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 200 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 240 |
2.6 L (2597 cc) |
10.7% bigger | 113 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 |
3.2 L (3199 cc) |
36.4% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
AMG CLK 55 |
5.44 L (5439 cc) |
131.8% bigger | 302 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 320 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 CGI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 94 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 270 CDI |
Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Precise engine size | 4.97 L (4966 cc) |
Difference from world average | 111.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 248 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 292 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 240 |
Precise engine size | 2.6 L (2597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 10.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 113 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | AMG CLK 55 |
Precise engine size | 5.44 L (5439 cc) |
Difference from world average | 131.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 302 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 320 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 230 |
2.3 L (2295 cc) |
2.2% smaller | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 |
3.2 L (3199 cc) |
36.4% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 213 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 430 |
4.27 L (4266 cc) |
81.8% bigger | 203 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 267 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2295 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 213 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 430 |
Precise engine size | 4.27 L (4266 cc) |
Difference from world average | 81.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 203 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 267 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 230 |
2.3 L (2295 cc) |
2.2% smaller | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 |
3.2 L (3199 cc) |
36.4% bigger | 145 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 188 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 430 |
4.27 L (4266 cc) |
81.8% bigger | 225 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 237 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2295 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 145 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 430 |
Precise engine size | 4.27 L (4266 cc) |
Difference from world average | 81.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 225 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 237 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 96 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 |
3.2 L (3199 cc) |
36.4% bigger | 145 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 188 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 230 |
2.3 L (2295 cc) |
2.2% smaller | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 145 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2295 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 230 |
2.3 L (2295 cc) |
2.2% smaller | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 430 |
4.27 L (4266 cc) |
81.8% bigger | 203 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 267 cc to 100 kg |
CLK 320 |
3.2 L (3199 cc) |
36.4% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 213 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2295 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 430 |
Precise engine size | 4.27 L (4266 cc) |
Difference from world average | 81.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 203 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 267 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 213 cc to 100 kg |