Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 T GDI |
1 L (999 cc) |
57.4% smaller | 27 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 83 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 37 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.0 T GDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1 L (999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 27 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 83 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 37 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.8 L (1795 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDi |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1795 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.8 L (1795 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDi |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 208 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1795 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 208 cc to 100 kg |