Renault Vel Satis Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Renault Vel Satis

Renault Vel Satis 2005

2002 Vel Satis

Quick notes on Renault Vel Satis engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.44 L (2440 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 3.5 L (3498 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.09 L bigger (+94 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 488 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 5.9 L smaller (-5942 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 2.02 L bigger (+2016 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 127 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2005 Renault Vel Satis

  • 2.0 T —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 dCi —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.2 dCi —2188 cc (2188 L)
  • 3.0 dCi V6 —2958 cc (2958 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 3.5 V6 —3498 cc (3498 L)

    2005 Renault Vel Satis Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 T —12.3 cc/hp (16.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 dCi —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 dCi —19 cc/hp (25.7 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 dCi V6 —16.7 cc/hp (22.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo —11.8 cc/hp (16 cc/kW)
  • 3.5 V6 —14.5 cc/hp (19.8 cc/kW)

    2005 Renault Vel Satis Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 T —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 dCi —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.2 dCi —6.73 or 158 cc smaller
  • 3.0 dCi V6 —26.09 or 612 cc bigger
  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 3.5 V6 —49.1 or 1152 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 T 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 82 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 dCi 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 118 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 dCi 2.19 L
    (2188 cc)
    6.7% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 129 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 dCi V6 2.96 L
    (2958 cc)
    26.1% bigger 110 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 174 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 85 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    3.5 V6 3.5 L
    (3498 cc)
    49.1% bigger 175 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 206 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 dCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 118 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 dCi
    Precise engine size 2.19 L (2188 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 129 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 dCi V6
    Precise engine size 2.96 L (2958 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 110 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 174 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.5 V6
    Precise engine size 3.5 L (3498 cc)
    Difference from world average 49.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 175 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 206 cc to 100 kg