2015 Avensis III Wagon (facelift 2015)
2015 Avensis III (facelift 2015)
2012 Avensis III (facelift 2012)
2012 Avensis III Wagon (facelift 2012)
2009 Avensis III
2009 Avensis III Wagon
2003 Avensis II
2003 Avensis II Wagon
2003 Avensis II Hatch
2001 Avensis Verso
1997 Avensis (T22)
1997 Avensis Hatch (T22)
1997 Avensis Wagon (T22)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Valvematic |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | - |
1.8 Valvematic |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 Valvematic |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | - |
1.6 D-4D |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 39 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 39 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Valvematic |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | - |
1.8 Valvematic |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | - |
1.6 D-4D |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 Valvematic |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Valvematic |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 Valvematic |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Valvematic |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 149 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 149 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 149 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 149 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 Valvematic |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 Valvematic |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Valvematic |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 149 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 149 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 159 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 159 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 159 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 159 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1987 cc) |
15.3% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-CAT |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1987 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT-i |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 VVT-i |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i 16V D-4 |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT-i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVT-i |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V D-4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT-i |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 VVT-i |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D-4D |
2.23 L (2231 cc) |
4.9% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i 16V D-4 |
2.36 L (2362 cc) |
0.7% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT-i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVT-i |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2.23 L (2231 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V D-4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2362 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT-i |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 VVT-i |
1.79 L (1794 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT-i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVT-i |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1794 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 45 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 45 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D-4D |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 45 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |