Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | - | 41 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 41 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |