Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 JTD |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.1 TD |
2.09 L (2088 cc) |
11% smaller | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.09 L (2088 cc) |
Difference from world average | 11 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |