Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 |
3 L (2997 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 102 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 103 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3 L (2997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 103 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i GTS |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i GTS |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |